Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8109U outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8109U is 14 days older than Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 28 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 12 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |