Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1746 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €322.64 vs €607.99
- Up to 43% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900KS - €2.07 vs €3.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-8100T - 168 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
156
92%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€322.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €322.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.62/FPS
57%
Price, €
€607.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |