Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1738 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €62.97 vs €484.66
- Up to 86% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-13900F - €0.29 vs €2.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-8100T - 233 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
214
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €62.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
13%
Price, €
€484.66
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €484.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |