Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 938 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i3-8100 - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - €159.18 vs €214.78
- Up to 26% better value when playing Control than Core i3-8100 - €0.79 vs €1.07 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
201
99.5049504950495%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
73.83177570093457%
Price, €
€214.78
74%
Buy for €214.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €159.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
80.89668615984405%
Multi-Core
3405
73.60570687418937%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |