Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 1281 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 60 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-7350K - 105 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1452
82.5938566552901%
Multi-Core
2873
33.87572220257045%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
