Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 250 days newer than Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i3-7300 - 100 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1260
92.37536656891496%
Multi-Core
2502
27.488464073829928%
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
