Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2674 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 11% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-860 - 109 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-860 - €154.63 vs €321.81
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €154.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Buy for €321.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |