Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €110.03 vs €141.58
- Up to 21% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10400F - €0.38 vs €0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-7100T - 295 vs 287 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
287
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13757 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
295
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
79%
Price, €
€141.58
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |