Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1129 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1820 - 202 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €7.0 vs €122.66
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €122.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76147 minutes ago
Buy for €7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
39.37449879711307%
Multi-Core
825
33.81147540983606%
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |