Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2023 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i3-6300 - 204 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
64.35492095869454%
Multi-Core
2539
33.372765509989485%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |