Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2583 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 51 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 24% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-6300 - 213 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€522.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €522.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
42.954390742001365%
Multi-Core
2539
13.160213548955578%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |