Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1405 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 3200G - 129 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
