Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1546 days newer than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-6100 - 192 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 64 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €60.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
72.98288508557457%
Multi-Core
2336
16.676185037121645%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |