Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i3-550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1513 days newer than Core i3-550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-550 - 160 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i3-550 - 35 vs 73 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i3-550
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-550 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
