Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Core i3-550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 877 days newer than Core i3-550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-550
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 6% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-550 - 95 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-550 - 6 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
95
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-550 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |