Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €20.36 vs €424.03
- Up to 95% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €0.13 vs €2.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-4170 - 162 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 16 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
156
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1858 minutes ago
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |