Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2110 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4160 - 134 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €110.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 614 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
67.98722044728434%
Multi-Core
2072
43.21167883211679%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |