Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1352 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 8% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 135 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
57.89473684210527%
Multi-Core
1051
50.72393822393823%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
