Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1535 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-4160 - 181 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
83.51648351648352%
Multi-Core
2072
27.797155889455325%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
