Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 1794 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-950 - 115 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-4150T
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
