Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €19.0 vs €444.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-12900F - €0.12 vs €2.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4150 - 183 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Buy for €444 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |