Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2430 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 37 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Core i3-4000M - 231 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 20 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€331.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €331.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |