Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3409 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4000M - 226 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€361.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €361.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |