Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1688 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 37 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4000M - 261 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 12 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
261
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€259.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |