Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4453 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 32% better in Remnant II than Core i3-380M - 102 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 32 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€377.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €377.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10871 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |