Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10750H outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10750H is 3446 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10750H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-380M - 217 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Core i7-10750H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-10750H |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
