Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 3614 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10300H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 57% better in F1 23 than Core i3-380M - 217 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i5-10300H |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 17th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
