Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Core i3-370M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3602 days newer than Core i3-370M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-370M - 416 vs 365 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-370M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-370M doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
416
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-370M | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |