Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 4949 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- Performs up to 227% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-350M - 271 vs 83 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Mobile • Jul 27th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
292
10.365637202697906%
Multi-Core
595
3.6093418259023355%
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |