Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 4646 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-350M - 263 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€362
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €362 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |