Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 814 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-3250 - 482 vs 453 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 51 vs 55 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
42.15530903328051%
Multi-Core
1130
44.505710909807014%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
