Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 279 days newer than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220T - 128 vs 127 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
86.09022556390977%
Multi-Core
941
83.27433628318585%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
