Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3221 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 11% better in Rocket League than Core i3-3250 - 749 vs 676 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
749
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€176.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €176.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
26.375805651958355%
Multi-Core
1130
12.444933920704845%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |