Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1709 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 95% better in League of Legends than Core i3-3250 - 119 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
50.331125827814574%
Multi-Core
1130
34.304796599878564%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
