Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 605 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4170 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3240T - 118 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i3-4170
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
40.59945504087194%
Multi-Core
971
45.586854460093896%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
