Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3775 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3240T - 229 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€436
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €436 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |