Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1681 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3240T - 173 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |