Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1788 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 18% better in Starfield than Core i3-3240T - 52 vs 44 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €134.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
45.426829268292686%
Multi-Core
971
34.26252646436133%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |