Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i3-3240T vs FX-9590

Core i3-3240T vs FX-9590: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — FX-9590 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 281 days newer than Core i3-3240T.

Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T

  • Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD FX-9590

  • Performs up to 0% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-3240T - 207 vs 206 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of Mass Effect: Andromeda.
Mass Effect: Andromeda

Mass Effect: Andromeda

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i3-3240T Logo
Core i3-3240T

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012


FPS

206

99.51690821256038%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

AMD FX-9590 Logo
FX-9590

Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013


FPS

207

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€163.64

100%

FPS Winner

AMD FX-9590 Black Edition FX 8-Core Processore

Buy for 163.64 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76670 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i3-3240T Logo
Core i3-3240T

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012

AMD FX-9590 Logo
FX-9590

Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i3-3240T Logo
Core i3-3240T

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

447

82.16911764705883%

Multi-Core

971

44.72593274988485%

AMD FX-9590 Logo
FX-9590

Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013


Single-Core

544

100%

Multi-Core

2171

100%

Intel Core i3-3240T Logo

Intel Core i3-3240T

vs
AMD FX-9590 Logo

AMD FX-9590

Sep 3rd, 2012Release Date
Jun 11th, 2013
Core i3CollectionFX
Ivy BridgeCodenameVishera
Intel Socket 1155SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
4Threads
8
2.9 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.7 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.0 GHz
35 W
TDP220 W
22 nm
Process Size32 nm
30.0x
Multiplier23.5x
Intel HD 2500
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.