Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 281 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 0% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-3240T - 207 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €163.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76670 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
82.16911764705883%
Multi-Core
971
44.72593274988485%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |