Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €23.0 vs €426.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €0.11 vs €1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-3240 - 233 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
211
90.55793991416309%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58236 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
6.0109289617486334%
Price, €
€426
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €426 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
20.375137918352333%
Multi-Core
1137
7.49406802003691%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |