Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €10.69 vs €544.99
- Up to 98% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-13900 - €0.05 vs €2.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-3225 - 233 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
211
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Buy for €544.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |