Buy on Amazon
€18.25
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €18.25 vs €69.02
- Up to 69% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-10105F - €0.09 vs €0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3220 - 240 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
209
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.25
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155
Buy for €18.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15166 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
31%
Price, €
€69.02
26%
FPS Winner
Intel, processore desktop Core i3-10105F 10, di 10ᵃ generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
