Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 77% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €18.31 vs €78.7
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G6900 - €0.12 vs €0.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3220 - 170 vs 155 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
155
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |