Buy on Amazon
€379.94
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3869 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 17% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3217U - 134 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 24 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-13700F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 16 core (8 P-core + 8 E-core) Cache 30 MB, fino a 5,2 GHz
Buy for €379.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 17 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i3-3217U or Core i7-13700F
ARK: Survival Evolved, 1920 x 1080, Epic
73 FPS
€20.7/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i7-13700F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,511.15
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
