Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2862 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3217U - 187 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
