Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2592 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 75% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3217U - 234 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 410 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |