Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 118 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 1% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-6350 - 74 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 6 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
