Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 708 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3120M - 198 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3120M - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |