Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2705 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 35 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 17% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-3110M - 260 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 16 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 127 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |