Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1917 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 60% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-3110M - 144 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 16 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
389
33.30479452054795%
Multi-Core
802
13.841905419399378%
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |